<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 183 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233598</link>
    <description>The dispute concerns denial of input tax credit for alleged capital goods and input services and the waiver of predeposit. The tribunal found the adjudicating authority failed to construe the second explanation to the statutory definition of &quot;input&quot; and must determine whether HR plates, MS plates and pipes used in machinery manufacture fall within that exclusion or within the definition of input; remanded for reconsideration. On input services, the claimant bears the burden to prove nexus with setting up the plant; the authority recorded lack of nexus without addressing that &#039;&#039;setting up of factory&#039;&#039; is expressly included in the definition of input service-remanded for de novo adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 10:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196012" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 183 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233598</link>
      <description>The dispute concerns denial of input tax credit for alleged capital goods and input services and the waiver of predeposit. The tribunal found the adjudicating authority failed to construe the second explanation to the statutory definition of &quot;input&quot; and must determine whether HR plates, MS plates and pipes used in machinery manufacture fall within that exclusion or within the definition of input; remanded for reconsideration. On input services, the claimant bears the burden to prove nexus with setting up the plant; the authority recorded lack of nexus without addressing that &#039;&#039;setting up of factory&#039;&#039; is expressly included in the definition of input service-remanded for de novo adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233598</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>