<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 181 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233596</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal regarding refund claims for business auxiliary services within the extended limitation period under Notification No. 41/07-ST but dismissed appeals for commission paid abroad due to time-barred filings, emphasizing compliance with prescribed limitation periods. The importance of adhering to statutory limitations and justifying delays in refund claim filings was underscored to ensure compliance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 10:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196010" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 181 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233596</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal regarding refund claims for business auxiliary services within the extended limitation period under Notification No. 41/07-ST but dismissed appeals for commission paid abroad due to time-barred filings, emphasizing compliance with prescribed limitation periods. The importance of adhering to statutory limitations and justifying delays in refund claim filings was underscored to ensure compliance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>