<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 178 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233593</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad directed the appellant to deposit Rs.75,000 within eight weeks and appear before the first appellate authority for a hearing to decide the appeal on its merits. The appeal was restored for disposal on merit after compliance with the deposit directive, emphasizing the importance of adhering to the principles of natural justice. Compliance with the deposit requirement was crucial for further proceedings, ultimately resulting in the appeal being disposed of by way of remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 17:57:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=196007" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 178 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233593</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad directed the appellant to deposit Rs.75,000 within eight weeks and appear before the first appellate authority for a hearing to decide the appeal on its merits. The appeal was restored for disposal on merit after compliance with the deposit directive, emphasizing the importance of adhering to the principles of natural justice. Compliance with the deposit requirement was crucial for further proceedings, ultimately resulting in the appeal being disposed of by way of remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>