https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233591 Sufficient cause was not established for condonation of a 98-day delay in filing the appeal because the explanation covered only part of the delay period and left the later period unexplained. The Tribunal treated a complete and satisfactory explanation for the entire delay as necessary and found that requirement unmet. The delay was therefore not condoned, and the appeal was dismissed together with the stay application. en-us Mon, 25 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Jul 2014 13:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233591 Sufficient cause was not established for condonation of a 98-day delay in filing the appeal because the explanation covered only part of the delay period and left the later period unexplained. The Tribunal treated a complete and satisfactory explanation for the entire delay as necessary and found that requirement unmet. The delay was therefore not condoned, and the appeal was dismissed together with the stay application. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 25 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233591