<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 153 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233568</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC quashed a transfer order under Section 127(1) of the Income Tax Act for lack of proper reasoning. The Commissioner had transferred the case for coordinated investigation without providing specific reasons explaining why the transfer was necessary. Following the SC precedent in Ajantha Industries, the HC held that mere mention of coordinated investigation is insufficient; the Commissioner must record reasons justifying the transfer&#039;s necessity. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner to pass a fresh order after providing opportunity to the petitioner and recording proper reasons in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 16:56:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195983" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 153 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233568</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC quashed a transfer order under Section 127(1) of the Income Tax Act for lack of proper reasoning. The Commissioner had transferred the case for coordinated investigation without providing specific reasons explaining why the transfer was necessary. Following the SC precedent in Ajantha Industries, the HC held that mere mention of coordinated investigation is insufficient; the Commissioner must record reasons justifying the transfer&#039;s necessity. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner to pass a fresh order after providing opportunity to the petitioner and recording proper reasons in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>