<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 147 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233562</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal partially allowed the appeal, emphasizing the bonafide belief of the appellant regarding the inclusion of statutory expenses in the taxable value. The tribunal found no merit in imposing a penalty under Section 78 but upheld the penalty under Section 77, thereby modifying the order of the Commissioner of Central Excise, Kolkata.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195977" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 147 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233562</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal partially allowed the appeal, emphasizing the bonafide belief of the appellant regarding the inclusion of statutory expenses in the taxable value. The tribunal found no merit in imposing a penalty under Section 78 but upheld the penalty under Section 77, thereby modifying the order of the Commissioner of Central Excise, Kolkata.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233562</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>