<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 146 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233561</link>
    <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal due to office shifting issues, emphasizing the narrow scope of the matter. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument on the mode of service not complying with the Act, the Tribunal found the actual receipt of the order crucial, dismissing the appeal as the order was validly served. The Tribunal highlighted that the mode of communication was irrelevant, focusing on the receipt of the order. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and the stay application was disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 13:42:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 146 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233561</link>
      <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal due to office shifting issues, emphasizing the narrow scope of the matter. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument on the mode of service not complying with the Act, the Tribunal found the actual receipt of the order crucial, dismissing the appeal as the order was validly served. The Tribunal highlighted that the mode of communication was irrelevant, focusing on the receipt of the order. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and the stay application was disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>