https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233556 A court should restrain proceedings before another judicial forum only in exceptional cases and where the statute expressly permits a stay mechanism; the Patents Act, 1970 contains no such power, unlike the Trade Marks Act, 1999, which shows express legislative provision when intended. Specialised tribunals are to be left free to decide matters within their jurisdiction, and the scope of alleged non-disclosure may also vary with the challenger's case. On that basis, the interim order deferring the revocation proceedings before the IPAB was liable to be recalled, and the revocation proceedings were allowed to continue. en-us Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 May 2013 13:42:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233556 A court should restrain proceedings before another judicial forum only in exceptional cases and where the statute expressly permits a stay mechanism; the Patents Act, 1970 contains no such power, unlike the Trade Marks Act, 1999, which shows express legislative provision when intended. Specialised tribunals are to be left free to decide matters within their jurisdiction, and the scope of alleged non-disclosure may also vary with the challenger's case. On that basis, the interim order deferring the revocation proceedings before the IPAB was liable to be recalled, and the revocation proceedings were allowed to continue. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233556