<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 109 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233524</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all condonation of delay applications, appeals, and stay petitions due to the significant delay in filing appeals ranging from 53 to 246 days and the lack of substantial justification beyond the medical certificate indicating the Chartered Accountant&#039;s sickness. The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to provide a valid reason for the delay, as evidenced by engaging counsel for a previous order during the same period. The judgment emphasizes the importance of timely action and the requirement for valid justifications when seeking condonation of delay in legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 09:01:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195939" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 109 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233524</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all condonation of delay applications, appeals, and stay petitions due to the significant delay in filing appeals ranging from 53 to 246 days and the lack of substantial justification beyond the medical certificate indicating the Chartered Accountant&#039;s sickness. The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to provide a valid reason for the delay, as evidenced by engaging counsel for a previous order during the same period. The judgment emphasizes the importance of timely action and the requirement for valid justifications when seeking condonation of delay in legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233524</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>