<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 102 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233517</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the deduction for indexed cost of acquisition based on the holding period of the previous owner of the property. The judgment clarified that for assets acquired through gift or will, the indexation should start from the year the previous owner first held the asset, in accordance with the relevant legal provisions and judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 08:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195932" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 102 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233517</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the deduction for indexed cost of acquisition based on the holding period of the previous owner of the property. The judgment clarified that for assets acquired through gift or will, the indexation should start from the year the previous owner first held the asset, in accordance with the relevant legal provisions and judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>