<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 95 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233510</link>
    <description>The court granted sanction to the Scheme of Arrangement under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, subject to the final order in Company Appeal No. 63 of 2012. The approval did not exempt the petitioner companies from statutory requirements, including stamp duty and taxes. The Transferor companies&#039; undertakings, properties, rights, and liabilities would vest in the Transferee company, resulting in the dissolution of the Transferor companies without winding up.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2013 15:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 95 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233510</link>
      <description>The court granted sanction to the Scheme of Arrangement under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, subject to the final order in Company Appeal No. 63 of 2012. The approval did not exempt the petitioner companies from statutory requirements, including stamp duty and taxes. The Transferor companies&#039; undertakings, properties, rights, and liabilities would vest in the Transferee company, resulting in the dissolution of the Transferor companies without winding up.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233510</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>