<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 92 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233507</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals and disposed of the Miscellaneous Applications after finding that the applicants failed to comply with the Tribunal&#039;s order and provisions of Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Despite extensions granted, the applicants did not deposit the required amount, leading to the dismissal of the appeals. The Tribunal noted the lack of merit in the second application seeking a waiver of the balance amount and upheld the original order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 15:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 92 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233507</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals and disposed of the Miscellaneous Applications after finding that the applicants failed to comply with the Tribunal&#039;s order and provisions of Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Despite extensions granted, the applicants did not deposit the required amount, leading to the dismissal of the appeals. The Tribunal noted the lack of merit in the second application seeking a waiver of the balance amount and upheld the original order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233507</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>