https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233481 Maintainability under the MRTP Act is examined alongside allegations concerning XOS charges, retention of collateral securities, refusal to enhance credit limits, and limitation or laches. The note explains that the complaint was challenged on statutory objections, including the absence of a legally sustainable unfair trade practice claim. It also records that XOS charges were said to arise from banking practice and regulatory reporting, while retention of collateral was justified by outstanding liabilities and credit enhancement was treated as a matter of commercial discretion. The discussion further emphasizes that unexplained delay can defeat stale claims and bar relief where transactions are long concluded. en-us Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Jan 2016 11:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233481 Maintainability under the MRTP Act is examined alongside allegations concerning XOS charges, retention of collateral securities, refusal to enhance credit limits, and limitation or laches. The note explains that the complaint was challenged on statutory objections, including the absence of a legally sustainable unfair trade practice claim. It also records that XOS charges were said to arise from banking practice and regulatory reporting, while retention of collateral was justified by outstanding liabilities and credit enhancement was treated as a matter of commercial discretion. The discussion further emphasizes that unexplained delay can defeat stale claims and bar relief where transactions are long concluded. Case-Laws Law of Competition Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233481