https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233481 Maintainability under the MRTP Act was challenged on the basis that the financial institution fell outside the statutory regime and that the allegations did not establish monopolistic, restrictive or unfair trade practices. XOS charges for outstanding export collection accounts were described as consistent with banking practice and regulatory reporting, with adjustments authorised by the complainant. Retention of collateral was linked to outstanding guarantees and charges, while credit enhancement remained a matter of commercial discretion. Long-unexplained delay in challenging collateral retention and XOS charges rendered the claims stale and barred by limitation and laches, defeating the complaint and compensation application. en-us Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Jan 2016 11:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233481 Maintainability under the MRTP Act was challenged on the basis that the financial institution fell outside the statutory regime and that the allegations did not establish monopolistic, restrictive or unfair trade practices. XOS charges for outstanding export collection accounts were described as consistent with banking practice and regulatory reporting, with adjustments authorised by the complainant. Retention of collateral was linked to outstanding guarantees and charges, while credit enhancement remained a matter of commercial discretion. Long-unexplained delay in challenging collateral retention and XOS charges rendered the claims stale and barred by limitation and laches, defeating the complaint and compensation application. Case-Laws Law of Competition Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233481