<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 59 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233473</link>
    <description>Interest on delayed entertainment tax was held recoverable because the governing rules made simple interest at 2% per month an automatic statutory consequence from the date of default until payment, and later quantification did not render the levy impermissibly retrospective. The penalty demand also survived because the assessee failed to furnish required information despite notices and opportunities, and the record showed incorrect disclosure and suppression of material facts; on that basis, the challenge based on natural justice failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 10:28:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 59 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233473</link>
      <description>Interest on delayed entertainment tax was held recoverable because the governing rules made simple interest at 2% per month an automatic statutory consequence from the date of default until payment, and later quantification did not render the levy impermissibly retrospective. The penalty demand also survived because the assessee failed to furnish required information despite notices and opportunities, and the record showed incorrect disclosure and suppression of material facts; on that basis, the challenge based on natural justice failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>