<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 56 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233470</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for the disputed amount paid twice and nullifying the penalties imposed under Section 73(3) of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was overturned, providing relief based on the correct application of the law and relevant precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 18:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 56 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233470</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for the disputed amount paid twice and nullifying the penalties imposed under Section 73(3) of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was overturned, providing relief based on the correct application of the law and relevant precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233470</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>