<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 44 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233458</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing the correct application of statutory provisions regarding deductions under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act and limitations on setting off unabsorbed depreciation. The Court found no merit in the appeal, as no substantial question of law arose, ultimately allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 12:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195874" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 44 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233458</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing the correct application of statutory provisions regarding deductions under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act and limitations on setting off unabsorbed depreciation. The Court found no merit in the appeal, as no substantial question of law arose, ultimately allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>