<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 39 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233453</link>
    <description>Delhi HC set aside CLB&#039;s order invalidating appellant company&#039;s requisition for EOGM to reconstitute respondent company&#039;s board. Court held requisition dated 26-11-2010 was validly signed by company secretary with proper authorization, despite respondent&#039;s objections. CLB&#039;s fraud finding was unsustainable. Court declared requisition and subsequent EOGM as legal and valid, set aside five director appointments made by respondent&#039;s board on 22-3-2011. However, court restricted appellant&#039;s removal of three directors including CMD to prevent management takeover, requiring CLB permission. EOGM scheduled for 18-5-2011 was allowed but removal resolutions would need CLB approval. Retired judge appointed as interim board chairman.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2025 10:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 39 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233453</link>
      <description>Delhi HC set aside CLB&#039;s order invalidating appellant company&#039;s requisition for EOGM to reconstitute respondent company&#039;s board. Court held requisition dated 26-11-2010 was validly signed by company secretary with proper authorization, despite respondent&#039;s objections. CLB&#039;s fraud finding was unsustainable. Court declared requisition and subsequent EOGM as legal and valid, set aside five director appointments made by respondent&#039;s board on 22-3-2011. However, court restricted appellant&#039;s removal of three directors including CMD to prevent management takeover, requiring CLB permission. EOGM scheduled for 18-5-2011 was allowed but removal resolutions would need CLB approval. Retired judge appointed as interim board chairman.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>