https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233440 The appeals before the Commissioner (Appeals) against two Order-in-Originals were rejected due to significant delays of 657 days and 256 days. The Tribunal could not condone the delays in filing appeals before the Commissioner (Appeals), leading to the rejection of the appeals and stay applications. The case highlights the necessity of complying with statutory timelines for appeals and the Tribunal's limited authority to condone delays in such matters. It emphasizes the importance of adhering to procedural requirements and the repercussions of failing to meet prescribed time limits in appeals before the Commissioner (Appeals). en-us Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Jul 2013 16:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233440 The appeals before the Commissioner (Appeals) against two Order-in-Originals were rejected due to significant delays of 657 days and 256 days. The Tribunal could not condone the delays in filing appeals before the Commissioner (Appeals), leading to the rejection of the appeals and stay applications. The case highlights the necessity of complying with statutory timelines for appeals and the Tribunal's limited authority to condone delays in such matters. It emphasizes the importance of adhering to procedural requirements and the repercussions of failing to meet prescribed time limits in appeals before the Commissioner (Appeals). Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233440