<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 24 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233438</link>
    <description>The cases ST/2097/2012 and 2030/2012 concerning Municipal Council Karnal were dismissed due to their failure to comply with the Tribunal&#039;s order regarding service tax deposit, despite an appeal filed in the Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court. The appeal did not overturn the original directive, leading to a default in pre-deposit by the Municipal Council.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 09:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 24 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233438</link>
      <description>The cases ST/2097/2012 and 2030/2012 concerning Municipal Council Karnal were dismissed due to their failure to comply with the Tribunal&#039;s order regarding service tax deposit, despite an appeal filed in the Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court. The appeal did not overturn the original directive, leading to a default in pre-deposit by the Municipal Council.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>