<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 20 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233434</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for a more diligent review. It acknowledged the appellant&#039;s evidence and directed the Assessing Officer to comply with earlier ITAT directions for thorough verification. The case highlighted discrepancies in verifying creditors/shareholders&#039; identities and capacities, with the appellant arguing that loan transactions were genuine but not adequately considered. The Tribunal noted the prolonged nature of the matter, making it impractical for the appellant to produce creditors/shareholders after a significant time lapse, ultimately calling for a more comprehensive assessment process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 11:21:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 20 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233434</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for a more diligent review. It acknowledged the appellant&#039;s evidence and directed the Assessing Officer to comply with earlier ITAT directions for thorough verification. The case highlighted discrepancies in verifying creditors/shareholders&#039; identities and capacities, with the appellant arguing that loan transactions were genuine but not adequately considered. The Tribunal noted the prolonged nature of the matter, making it impractical for the appellant to produce creditors/shareholders after a significant time lapse, ultimately calling for a more comprehensive assessment process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>