<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 669 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233405</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the tax demand on the appellant for alleged commission receipt in March 2010, remanding the case to the original authority for further review in accordance with the law. The appellant&#039;s argument that no commission was received in March 2010 was upheld, emphasizing the necessity for a detailed assessment of the disputed issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:15:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 669 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233405</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the tax demand on the appellant for alleged commission receipt in March 2010, remanding the case to the original authority for further review in accordance with the law. The appellant&#039;s argument that no commission was received in March 2010 was upheld, emphasizing the necessity for a detailed assessment of the disputed issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233405</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>