<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 653 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233389</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Commissioner for a fresh decision, directing a comprehensive re-examination of the goods and a proper valuation process in accordance with the Customs Valuation Rules. The Tribunal stressed the importance of procedural fairness and the need for specific evidence to support any deviation from the declared classification and value. The Commissioner was instructed to expedite the re-adjudication process, considering the perishable nature of the goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 09:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 653 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233389</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Commissioner for a fresh decision, directing a comprehensive re-examination of the goods and a proper valuation process in accordance with the Customs Valuation Rules. The Tribunal stressed the importance of procedural fairness and the need for specific evidence to support any deviation from the declared classification and value. The Commissioner was instructed to expedite the re-adjudication process, considering the perishable nature of the goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>