<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 652 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233388</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld SEBI&#039;s actions against the appellant, a Director of a listed company, for serious financial irregularities, including inflated profits and false disclosures. SEBI&#039;s order restraining the appellant from dealing in securities for two years and imposing a monetary penalty of 50 lakhs was affirmed. The judgment stressed the significance of investor protection, market integrity, and Directors&#039; responsibilities in maintaining transparency and preventing market abuse. SEBI&#039;s role in safeguarding investors and upholding market integrity was highlighted in dismissing the appellant&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2017 12:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 652 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233388</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld SEBI&#039;s actions against the appellant, a Director of a listed company, for serious financial irregularities, including inflated profits and false disclosures. SEBI&#039;s order restraining the appellant from dealing in securities for two years and imposing a monetary penalty of 50 lakhs was affirmed. The judgment stressed the significance of investor protection, market integrity, and Directors&#039; responsibilities in maintaining transparency and preventing market abuse. SEBI&#039;s role in safeguarding investors and upholding market integrity was highlighted in dismissing the appellant&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>