https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233369 Pending disposal of a taxpayer's application under the VAT settlement scheme, coercive recovery should not proceed where the statutory framework contemplates meaningful consideration of the application and interim protection is necessary to preserve the remedy. Relying on its earlier approach in an identical matter, the Court directed the Settlement Authority to decide the application within a fixed time-frame and restrained recovery action until that decision is taken. The operative effect is that settlement applicants may receive interim protection against coercive measures while their applications remain undecided. en-us Thu, 22 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:16:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233369 Pending disposal of a taxpayer's application under the VAT settlement scheme, coercive recovery should not proceed where the statutory framework contemplates meaningful consideration of the application and interim protection is necessary to preserve the remedy. Relying on its earlier approach in an identical matter, the Court directed the Settlement Authority to decide the application within a fixed time-frame and restrained recovery action until that decision is taken. The operative effect is that settlement applicants may receive interim protection against coercive measures while their applications remain undecided. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 22 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233369