<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 632 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233368</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging an assessment order levying interest under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 was held not maintainable where a statutory revisional remedy was available. In fiscal matters, writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is ordinarily not invoked before exhausting the remedy provided by the statute. The petition was therefore not entertained and was dismissed, with liberty to pursue the revisional remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:16:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195784" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 632 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233368</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging an assessment order levying interest under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 was held not maintainable where a statutory revisional remedy was available. In fiscal matters, writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is ordinarily not invoked before exhausting the remedy provided by the statute. The petition was therefore not entertained and was dismissed, with liberty to pursue the revisional remedy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>