<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 625 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233361</link>
    <description>The Tribunal revoked the suspension of the Custom House Agent license, citing the lack of evidence showing direct involvement in fraudulent activities and the failure to issue a final notice for license revocation within the prescribed time frame. The decision emphasized the importance of periodic review of license suspensions based on factors like the gravity of the act, extent of involvement, and time lapsed. The Tribunal clarified that the revocation did not prejudice the Revenue&#039;s right to issue a notice disclosing evidence of direct involvement for further proceedings, highlighting the necessity of proper review and adherence to procedural requirements in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 06:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195777" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 625 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233361</link>
      <description>The Tribunal revoked the suspension of the Custom House Agent license, citing the lack of evidence showing direct involvement in fraudulent activities and the failure to issue a final notice for license revocation within the prescribed time frame. The decision emphasized the importance of periodic review of license suspensions based on factors like the gravity of the act, extent of involvement, and time lapsed. The Tribunal clarified that the revocation did not prejudice the Revenue&#039;s right to issue a notice disclosing evidence of direct involvement for further proceedings, highlighting the necessity of proper review and adherence to procedural requirements in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>