https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233359 The Competition Commission of India identified a prima facie case of abuse of dominant position by a television viewership measurement firm under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002. The firm was accused of underreporting viewership data by focusing solely on urban areas, thereby distorting the true viewership landscape and disadvantaging channels targeting rural audiences. This conduct was seen as detrimental to fair competition in the advertisement market. Consequently, the Commission directed the Director General to investigate the matter and submit a report within 60 days, emphasizing the need for an impartial examination of the allegations without pre-judging the case's merits. en-us Tue, 05 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Nov 2024 17:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233359 The Competition Commission of India identified a prima facie case of abuse of dominant position by a television viewership measurement firm under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002. The firm was accused of underreporting viewership data by focusing solely on urban areas, thereby distorting the true viewership landscape and disadvantaging channels targeting rural audiences. This conduct was seen as detrimental to fair competition in the advertisement market. Consequently, the Commission directed the Director General to investigate the matter and submit a report within 60 days, emphasizing the need for an impartial examination of the allegations without pre-judging the case's merits. Case-Laws Law of Competition Tue, 05 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233359