<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 591 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233327</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that excise duty applies only to skimmed milk powder intended for sale, not for captive use, supported by the relevant tariff entry and subsequent exemption notification. The appeal was allowed, rejecting the demand for duty on retained skimmed milk powder used for regeneration during lean season. The distinction between packaging for captive use and sale, along with industry practices, played a vital role in the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 11:10:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 591 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233327</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that excise duty applies only to skimmed milk powder intended for sale, not for captive use, supported by the relevant tariff entry and subsequent exemption notification. The appeal was allowed, rejecting the demand for duty on retained skimmed milk powder used for regeneration during lean season. The distinction between packaging for captive use and sale, along with industry practices, played a vital role in the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>