<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 579 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=232330</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the additions made by the CIT(A) in most cases for various assessment years due to the assessee&#039;s failure to provide sufficient evidence to prove the genuineness of transactions, identity of parties, and capacity of creditors. The Tribunal emphasized the need for corroborative evidence and dismissed arguments related to the violation of principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 20:13:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 579 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=232330</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the additions made by the CIT(A) in most cases for various assessment years due to the assessee&#039;s failure to provide sufficient evidence to prove the genuineness of transactions, identity of parties, and capacity of creditors. The Tribunal emphasized the need for corroborative evidence and dismissed arguments related to the violation of principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=232330</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>