<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 563 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=231315</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found evidence against appellants, including M/s. Cubex Tubings Ltd., and individuals like Shri Surendra Prakash Bhandari, supporting irregularities in importing goods and taking credit without actual receipt. Despite arguments of natural justice violations, the Tribunal upheld findings of irregular credit based on unreliable documents. Involvement of various individuals in preparing false documents was established, leading to ordered deposit amounts for each party involved. The Tribunal disposed of stay applications by setting specific deposit deadlines, granting waivers upon compliance, and staying recovery pending appeal disposal, with defaulting appellants facing dismissal without further notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 11:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 563 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=231315</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found evidence against appellants, including M/s. Cubex Tubings Ltd., and individuals like Shri Surendra Prakash Bhandari, supporting irregularities in importing goods and taking credit without actual receipt. Despite arguments of natural justice violations, the Tribunal upheld findings of irregular credit based on unreliable documents. Involvement of various individuals in preparing false documents was established, leading to ordered deposit amounts for each party involved. The Tribunal disposed of stay applications by setting specific deposit deadlines, granting waivers upon compliance, and staying recovery pending appeal disposal, with defaulting appellants facing dismissal without further notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=231315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>