https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=231308 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the rejection of the condonation application for significant delay in filing an appeal against assessment and penalty orders. The petitioner's failure to file a separate appeal against the penalty order, coupled with insufficient explanation for the delay, led to the dismissal. The court emphasized the need for concrete evidence to prove counsel mistakes, placing the burden of proof on the petitioner. Diligence and documentation in legal proceedings were highlighted as crucial to avoid adverse outcomes. en-us Wed, 05 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:08:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=231308 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the rejection of the condonation application for significant delay in filing an appeal against assessment and penalty orders. The petitioner's failure to file a separate appeal against the penalty order, coupled with insufficient explanation for the delay, led to the dismissal. The court emphasized the need for concrete evidence to prove counsel mistakes, placing the burden of proof on the petitioner. Diligence and documentation in legal proceedings were highlighted as crucial to avoid adverse outcomes. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 05 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=231308