<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 552 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=231304</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for service tax liability of Rs.40,850 with interest and penalties. The appellant successfully argued that service tax should not be charged from any other person if already paid by the liable party, supported by certificates from transport companies confirming payment of the tax. The Tribunal referenced previous decisions and a CBEC circular to support their ruling, emphasizing the principle of avoiding double taxation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2014 15:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 552 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=231304</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for service tax liability of Rs.40,850 with interest and penalties. The appellant successfully argued that service tax should not be charged from any other person if already paid by the liable party, supported by certificates from transport companies confirming payment of the tax. The Tribunal referenced previous decisions and a CBEC circular to support their ruling, emphasizing the principle of avoiding double taxation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=231304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>