<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 548 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=231300</link>
    <description>Garnishee recovery under section 226(3) requires the noticee to owe money to, or hold money for, the assessee in the same legal capacity when notice is issued. A bank holding a firm&#039;s overdrawn cash-credit account is its creditor, not its debtor; a proprietor&#039;s separate savings account cannot be combined with the firm account without a notice directed to that account. The earlier garnishee notice had been abandoned and could not support recovery. Personal liability of a branch manager as an assessee in default requires proof that the bank&#039;s statutory objection was materially false. As that precondition was not established, the recovery order was unsustainable and was quashed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 14:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195700" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 548 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=231300</link>
      <description>Garnishee recovery under section 226(3) requires the noticee to owe money to, or hold money for, the assessee in the same legal capacity when notice is issued. A bank holding a firm&#039;s overdrawn cash-credit account is its creditor, not its debtor; a proprietor&#039;s separate savings account cannot be combined with the firm account without a notice directed to that account. The earlier garnishee notice had been abandoned and could not support recovery. Personal liability of a branch manager as an assessee in default requires proof that the bank&#039;s statutory objection was materially false. As that precondition was not established, the recovery order was unsustainable and was quashed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=231300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>