<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 546 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=231298</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The penalty was deemed unjustified as the expenses related to uncommenced projects were disclosed genuinely, with no incorrect particulars provided, and accepted by the assessee in good faith. The Tribunal found that the penalty lacked justification due to the absence of specific satisfaction recorded by the Assessing Officer and ruled in favor of the assessee based on Supreme Court precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 09:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 546 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=231298</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The penalty was deemed unjustified as the expenses related to uncommenced projects were disclosed genuinely, with no incorrect particulars provided, and accepted by the assessee in good faith. The Tribunal found that the penalty lacked justification due to the absence of specific satisfaction recorded by the Assessing Officer and ruled in favor of the assessee based on Supreme Court precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=231298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>