https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=230271 A disputed question of breach and liability to levy compensation under a contract cannot be treated as a unilateral or excepted matter where the contractor contests the levy and the arbitrator records reasoned findings on delay, employer-caused hindrances, and coercion in obtaining an undertaking. Such findings are not to be interfered with under Section 34 absent perversity, jurisdictional error, or patent illegality. The arbitrator's award of interest and costs will also be sustained where it is supported by the contractual setting, evidence, and recorded reasons, and is not shown to be unreasonable. On these principles, the arbitral award was left undisturbed in material part. en-us Tue, 02 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=230271 A disputed question of breach and liability to levy compensation under a contract cannot be treated as a unilateral or excepted matter where the contractor contests the levy and the arbitrator records reasoned findings on delay, employer-caused hindrances, and coercion in obtaining an undertaking. Such findings are not to be interfered with under Section 34 absent perversity, jurisdictional error, or patent illegality. The arbitrator's award of interest and costs will also be sustained where it is supported by the contractual setting, evidence, and recorded reasons, and is not shown to be unreasonable. On these principles, the arbitral award was left undisturbed in material part. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 02 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=230271