<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 480 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=227248</link>
    <description>Reassessment proceedings were held to be vitiated where notice under section 143(2) was not issued, so the reassessment for assessment year 2003-04 was cancelled. The Tribunal also treated the Sanpada land as validly converted from a capital asset into stock in trade under section 45(2), relying on development steps, approvals and a notarial declaration. It further held that the resulting capital gains became taxable in assessment year 2005-06, when the converted stock was sold and consideration was received. For computation, the land&#039;s market value on allotment was taken as the cost of acquisition, and the fair market value on conversion was accepted as the full value of consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 07:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 480 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=227248</link>
      <description>Reassessment proceedings were held to be vitiated where notice under section 143(2) was not issued, so the reassessment for assessment year 2003-04 was cancelled. The Tribunal also treated the Sanpada land as validly converted from a capital asset into stock in trade under section 45(2), relying on development steps, approvals and a notarial declaration. It further held that the resulting capital gains became taxable in assessment year 2005-06, when the converted stock was sold and consideration was received. For computation, the land&#039;s market value on allotment was taken as the cost of acquisition, and the fair market value on conversion was accepted as the full value of consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=227248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>