<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 477 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=227245</link>
    <description>The Court held that an appeal is not maintainable against an order of prohibition under Regulation 21 of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 2004. It upheld the validity of Regulations 21 and 22(8) of the CHALR, 2004, answering Question (a) in the affirmative and Questions (b) and (c) in the negative. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 17:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 477 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=227245</link>
      <description>The Court held that an appeal is not maintainable against an order of prohibition under Regulation 21 of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 2004. It upheld the validity of Regulations 21 and 22(8) of the CHALR, 2004, answering Question (a) in the affirmative and Questions (b) and (c) in the negative. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=227245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>