https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=227243 Section 34 review of an arbitral award remains narrow, and a court will not interfere merely because another view on the contractual claims is possible. The award was found to contain reasoned consideration of the evidence and contract clauses, and the objections alleging lack of reasons, excess of jurisdiction, and non-consideration of restitution principles were not made out. The court reiterated that it cannot reappreciate evidence or sit in appeal over the tribunal's interpretation of the contract, and no patent illegality, perversity, or other statutory ground for setting aside was established. en-us Tue, 02 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Apr 2013 17:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=227243 Section 34 review of an arbitral award remains narrow, and a court will not interfere merely because another view on the contractual claims is possible. The award was found to contain reasoned consideration of the evidence and contract clauses, and the objections alleging lack of reasons, excess of jurisdiction, and non-consideration of restitution principles were not made out. The court reiterated that it cannot reappreciate evidence or sit in appeal over the tribunal's interpretation of the contract, and no patent illegality, perversity, or other statutory ground for setting aside was established. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 02 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=227243