https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=227242 A review court held that a deferral of decision on a Section 8 Arbitration and Conciliation Act application could not stand where the earlier matter relied upon was decided by consent, not on merits, and had no binding effect on the present recovery suit. It found that the connected proceedings involved different grounds and a different cause profile, so the postponement reason was untenable. The earlier reasons were recalled, the review was allowed, and the defendant's arbitral-reference objection was restored for independent determination on its own merits in the suit. en-us Tue, 02 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Apr 2013 07:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=227242 A review court held that a deferral of decision on a Section 8 Arbitration and Conciliation Act application could not stand where the earlier matter relied upon was decided by consent, not on merits, and had no binding effect on the present recovery suit. It found that the connected proceedings involved different grounds and a different cause profile, so the postponement reason was untenable. The earlier reasons were recalled, the review was allowed, and the defendant's arbitral-reference objection was restored for independent determination on its own merits in the suit. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 02 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=227242