<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 469 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=227237</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit was treated as admissible on duty paid towards facility charges for mixing gases used in the factory, even though no separate input goods were received from the provider. The Tribunal noted that credit could be taken where duty had been paid on the goods or service received, and it relied on the appellant&#039;s earlier case involving identical credit for a previous period. As there was no material showing that the earlier favourable order had been challenged by the department, the credit was upheld and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 06:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195622" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 469 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=227237</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit was treated as admissible on duty paid towards facility charges for mixing gases used in the factory, even though no separate input goods were received from the provider. The Tribunal noted that credit could be taken where duty had been paid on the goods or service received, and it relied on the appellant&#039;s earlier case involving identical credit for a previous period. As there was no material showing that the earlier favourable order had been challenged by the department, the credit was upheld and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=227237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>