<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 468 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=227236</link>
    <description>The revision application was rejected as devoid of merit, and the impugned Order-in-Appeal was upheld. The government found no infirmity in the decision, confirming that the exemption under Notification No. 6/2002-C.E., as amended, was absolute, and no duty was payable on the parts used in the manufacture of tractors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 17:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195621" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 468 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=227236</link>
      <description>The revision application was rejected as devoid of merit, and the impugned Order-in-Appeal was upheld. The government found no infirmity in the decision, confirming that the exemption under Notification No. 6/2002-C.E., as amended, was absolute, and no duty was payable on the parts used in the manufacture of tractors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=227236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>