<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 463 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=226233</link>
    <description>A quasi-judicial tax assessment must contain clear, explicit reasons and must meaningfully deal with the assessee&#039;s material before treating disputed sales as local sales. Here, the authority relied mainly on inspection materials and purchase orders, but did not properly analyse the dealer&#039;s objections, quotations, import and excise records, or CST payment evidence from other States; the counter affidavit could not cure that defect. The Madras HC set aside the assessment insofar as it concerned the inter-State sale issue and remitted the matter for fresh consideration and a reasoned order after hearing the assessee, while leaving the suppression allegation open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 463 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=226233</link>
      <description>A quasi-judicial tax assessment must contain clear, explicit reasons and must meaningfully deal with the assessee&#039;s material before treating disputed sales as local sales. Here, the authority relied mainly on inspection materials and purchase orders, but did not properly analyse the dealer&#039;s objections, quotations, import and excise records, or CST payment evidence from other States; the counter affidavit could not cure that defect. The Madras HC set aside the assessment insofar as it concerned the inter-State sale issue and remitted the matter for fresh consideration and a reasoned order after hearing the assessee, while leaving the suppression allegation open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=226233</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>