<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 451 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=226221</link>
    <description>The court directed the petitioner to submit a detailed request with the valuation report of the Egmore property to the competent authority. If the valuation is satisfactory, the authority should revoke provisional attachments on other properties. The petitioner has one week to submit the request, and the authority has three weeks to make a decision. The writ petitions were disposed of with no costs incurred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2013 15:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 451 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=226221</link>
      <description>The court directed the petitioner to submit a detailed request with the valuation report of the Egmore property to the competent authority. If the valuation is satisfactory, the authority should revoke provisional attachments on other properties. The petitioner has one week to submit the request, and the authority has three weeks to make a decision. The writ petitions were disposed of with no costs incurred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=226221</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>