https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=226210 A petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act was held not maintainable against an order disposing of a Section 16 application that upheld the arbitral tribunal's jurisdiction. The Court noted that the arbitrator had found the arbitration clause to survive execution of the sale deed and had treated the claims as within arbitral jurisdiction. Because the challenge was directed only at that interlocutory jurisdictional determination, the petition was dismissed, with liberty to raise such grievances after the arbitral award, if required. en-us Tue, 02 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Apr 2013 08:00:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=226210 A petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act was held not maintainable against an order disposing of a Section 16 application that upheld the arbitral tribunal's jurisdiction. The Court noted that the arbitrator had found the arbitration clause to survive execution of the sale deed and had treated the claims as within arbitral jurisdiction. Because the challenge was directed only at that interlocutory jurisdictional determination, the petition was dismissed, with liberty to raise such grievances after the arbitral award, if required. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 02 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=226210