https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=226183 Jurisdictional and res judicata objections failed because the earlier cooperative court order merely returned the plaint after loss of jurisdiction, the parties accepted that order, and the later statutory arbitration was treated as maintainable; the petitioners also waived objection by participating without challenge. Limitation was not attracted because the special multi-state cooperative law governed computation, and the claim was filed within the relevant statutory period. No breach of natural justice or bias was established on the record. However, attachment over properties claimed by legal heirs could not continue without a finding on whether those assets were inherited from the deceased and the extent of liability, so that part was set aside and remitted for fresh decision. en-us Tue, 02 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Apr 2013 21:16:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=226183 Jurisdictional and res judicata objections failed because the earlier cooperative court order merely returned the plaint after loss of jurisdiction, the parties accepted that order, and the later statutory arbitration was treated as maintainable; the petitioners also waived objection by participating without challenge. Limitation was not attracted because the special multi-state cooperative law governed computation, and the claim was filed within the relevant statutory period. No breach of natural justice or bias was established on the record. However, attachment over properties claimed by legal heirs could not continue without a finding on whether those assets were inherited from the deceased and the extent of liability, so that part was set aside and remitted for fresh decision. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 02 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=226183