<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 409 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=226179</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the denial of cenvat credit on paints, thinners, welding electrodes, and steel items used in machinery fabrication. The case was remanded for a fresh decision on the eligibility of cenvat credit based on the evidence presented by the appellant. The importance of considering all evidence and legal precedents in determining cenvat credit eligibility was highlighted in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 14:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195562" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 409 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=226179</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the denial of cenvat credit on paints, thinners, welding electrodes, and steel items used in machinery fabrication. The case was remanded for a fresh decision on the eligibility of cenvat credit based on the evidence presented by the appellant. The importance of considering all evidence and legal precedents in determining cenvat credit eligibility was highlighted in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=226179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>