<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 399 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=226169</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court affirmed the Delhi High Court&#039;s decision, ruling that Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) are personal information exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(j) of the Right to Information Act unless a larger public interest is shown. The Court stressed the mandatory procedure under Section 11 for disclosing third-party information. The appellant&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the Division Bench&#039;s judgment was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2013 11:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 399 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=226169</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court affirmed the Delhi High Court&#039;s decision, ruling that Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) are personal information exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(j) of the Right to Information Act unless a larger public interest is shown. The Court stressed the mandatory procedure under Section 11 for disclosing third-party information. The appellant&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the Division Bench&#039;s judgment was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=226169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>