<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 385 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=226155</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed applications for condonation of delay in filing appeals as they were filed after the prescribed time limit. The appeals were dismissed by the first appellate authority due to being filed belatedly. The Tribunal upheld the dismissal, citing Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Stay petitions and appeals were also dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 10:39:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 385 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=226155</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed applications for condonation of delay in filing appeals as they were filed after the prescribed time limit. The appeals were dismissed by the first appellate authority due to being filed belatedly. The Tribunal upheld the dismissal, citing Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Stay petitions and appeals were also dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=226155</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>