<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 382 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=226152</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed all three appeals filed by the appellants, setting aside the penalties imposed on them for duty liability default and penalty imposition under Rule 25 and Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules. The judgment highlighted the significance of rectifying defaults by making payments in cash to avoid penalties under the Central Excise Rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 12:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 382 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=226152</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed all three appeals filed by the appellants, setting aside the penalties imposed on them for duty liability default and penalty imposition under Rule 25 and Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules. The judgment highlighted the significance of rectifying defaults by making payments in cash to avoid penalties under the Central Excise Rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=226152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>