<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 381 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=226151</link>
    <description>The appeal challenging the admissibility of cenvat credit on services related to non-manufacturing inputs for exported goods was dismissed. The court ruled that services used for traded items not involved in manufacturing are not eligible for cenvat credit, citing the precedent set by the Chennai CESTAT bench and emphasizing the lack of usage of traded items in the manufacturing process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 10:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 381 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=226151</link>
      <description>The appeal challenging the admissibility of cenvat credit on services related to non-manufacturing inputs for exported goods was dismissed. The court ruled that services used for traded items not involved in manufacturing are not eligible for cenvat credit, citing the precedent set by the Chennai CESTAT bench and emphasizing the lack of usage of traded items in the manufacturing process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=226151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>